This resource guide is aimed at direct and indirect private equity and real assets equity investors looking to identify publicly available resources and initiatives to help them incorporate climate change considerations throughout the investment process.

It builds upon the Investor Agenda’s Investor Climate Action Plans (ICAPs) expectations ladder and associated guidance document which were published to help investors develop comprehensive net-zero transition strategies across asset classes and serve as a baseline of how they can plan to implement climate pledges.

This document complements the PRI’s Climate change for private markets resource hub by contextualising the resources included there – we encourage readers to use them together.

It is not exhaustive, however, and does not cover the non-financial disclosure requirements and climate-related considerations that are increasingly being mandated by regulation, including the Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation, the Financial Conduct Authority’s Sustainable Disclosure Requirements, and country- or regional-level sustainable finance taxonomies.

We will periodically update this document and the resource hub and encourage signatories to suggest additional resources for consideration. Contact us at [email protected].

Using this resource guide

The ICAPs expectations ladder covers five focus areas: investment, corporate engagement, investor disclosure, governance and policy advocacy.

This guide maps the relevant actions for these (with the exception of policy advocacy[1]) against the investment process of indirect and direct private markets investors (see Figure 1) and provides commentary and links to relevant PRI or third-party guidance that can inform their action plans.

Readers are encouraged to use Figures 2 and 3 to navigate the indirect and direct investor sections respectively. Clicking on an investment stage or topic will redirect readers to that part of the guide.

Figure 1: Indirect and direct investment process

 

Indirect

Direct

About the Climate change for private markets resource hub

The resource hub provides private markets investors with easy access to tools, guides and insights to support their actions towards net-zero emissions and building more resilient companies and assets. Developed following discussions with the PRI’s private equity and infrastructure advisory committees, it also includes a comprehensive list of relevant investor initiatives dedicated to climate change, which this resource guide will refer to. The ICAPs expectations ladder encourages direct and indirect investors to support, actively participate in, and lead such initiatives.

Section A: Indirect investors

This section targets investors that are one step removed from their investments. This includes limited partners (LPs) in private market funds, fund of fund general partners (GPs) and LPs in secondaries-focused funds.

Figure 2: The ICAPs expectations ladder mapped to the indirect investment process

Governance Investment External_manager Investor_disclosure

Governance

Investment

External manager engagement

Investor disclosure

Pre-commitment to fund
Fund ownership
Fund liquidisation
N/A N/A N/A

Climate change incorporation and co-investments

Although resources referring to co-investments exist, for example the Science Based Targets initiative’s private equity guidance  and the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC)’s Net Zero Investment Framework (NZIF) private equity consultation document  (pg.12, section D), guidance specific to climate change incorporation in the context of co-investments is not readily available. Indirect investors are encouraged to apply the guides and tools referenced throughout this.

I. Pre-commitment to fund

GovernanceInvestmentExternal manager engagementInvestor disclosure
Pre-commitment to fund
  • Policy
  • Accountability
  • Planning and evaluation
  • Skills assessment
  • Strategy
  • Risk management
  • Asset allocation
  • Additional targetsetting
  • Engagement
  • Commitments, objectives and targets
  • TCFD alignment

 

Governance

To effectively and systematically incorporate climate change into the investment process, indirect investors should ensure that they have robust internal governance structures in place prior to making an investment. They can do so by embedding climate change into their investment policies, developing accountability mechanisms, including by defining clear roles and responsibilities, and climate plans, alongside assessing organisation-wide skills and expertise. [2]

Indirect investors should also ensure that appropriate climate governance structures exist within their underlying managers’ operations. See External manager engagement for tools to do so.

Key resources

Investment

Given their limited influence post-investment, indirect investors need to set out their climate expectations for their managers prior to making a commitment, to have them embedded within managers’ investment decisions and strategies.

Indirect investors should focus on setting emissions reduction strategies and targets for their private markets portfolio, and establish formal investment and manager selection, appointment and monitoring policies that reflect these objectives.

At the investment level, they should redirect capital towards funds targeting assets that are aligned or seeking to align to a low-carbon economy, and assess the physical and transition risks of potential investments made through such funds (including through the use of scenario analysis).

Key resources

Alignment target and additional target setting:

  • The Private equity sector-science based target guidance includes advice for secondaries and funds of funds (pgs.55-57) on setting science-based targets.
  • The second edition of the UN-convened Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance’s (NZAOA) Target Setting Protocol provides guidance for asset owners on setting emissions reduction targets for real estate (pgs.43-47) and infrastructure (pgs.47-55).
  • The NZIF includes guidance for investment managers and asset owners on aligning real estate portfolios to net zero (pg.20). A proposed private equity framework also includes an asset class-specific methodology to measure net-zero portfolio alignment and provides indirect investors with portfolio assessment and management guidance (pg.11, section A).
  • The Oxford Principles for Net Zero Aligned Carbon Offsetting set out high-level principles for developing credible decarbonisation plans (pgs.5-12). Indirect investors can use these to inform their own, and to assess their external managers’ plans.

Strategy and asset allocation:

Risk management:

  • TCFD for private equity GPs (pg.24) and TCFD for real assets investors (pgs.18-20) explain how to conduct scenario analysis, based on the TCFD’s sector-agnostic scenario analysis guidance.
  • The proposed NZIF private equity framework provides indirect investors with guidance on assessing and managing net-zero portfolio alignment (pg.11, section A).
  • Indirect investors can use the SASB Materiality Finder to identify the industries for which climate risk is financially material and to inform their climate risk management approach.

Example: SWEN Capital Partners – Climate meeting clause

In 2017, SWEN Capital Partners introduced a climate meeting clause for new investments, requiring GPs to hold a meeting with them 18 months after subscription to discuss how they integrate climate change into their investment process. The clause is discussed before investing in a GP, resulting in developing climate awareness at an early stage. See TCFD for real assets investors (pg.26).

External manager engagement [3]

Indirect investors should engage with external managers on climate change before making a commitment, to:

  • understand their managers’ climate change-related policies and practices;
  • communicate their climate change strategy, targets and expectations;
  • encourage better governance, management and disclosure of physical and transition risks; and ultimately
  • inform their investment decisions.

Key resources

Investor disclosure

Indirect investors should ensure that what they implement; prior to committing to a fund as described above – relating; to climate governance, investment strategy, target setting and engagement – is adequately disclosed. This includes disclosing their commitments, objectives and targets and reporting information in line with the TCFD recommendations.

Signatories to the different climate initiatives (e.g., NZ AOA,PAII) may have additional climate reporting and disclosure requirements as part of the commitments they have made. See the relevant initiative websites to learn more.

Key resources

Commitments, objectives and targets:

TCFD alignment:

II. Fund ownership

GovernanceInvestmentExternal manager engagementInvestor disclosure
Fund ownership
  • Accountability
  • Board reporting
  • Skills assessment
  • Risk management
  • Engagement
  • Commitments, objectives and targets
  • Carbon emissions
  • Portfolio assessment
  • TCFD alignment

Governance

During fund ownership, indirect investors should maintain adequate oversight and accountability of climate-related risks and opportunities, and regularly report on those to their boards and senior management. The resources shared in the Pre-commitment to fund section are also relevant here.

Indirect investors should also continuously monitor the climate governance of their external managers. Tools to do so are shared in External manager engagement below.

Investment

While one step removed from the underlying portfolio companies and assets, indirect investors should seek to understand their exposure to transition and physical risks by:

  • measuring the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with their investments;
  • undertaking climate risk assessments and conducting scenario analyses; and
  • using the assessments conducted by their external managers.

These can form the basis of subsequent engagement with, and monitoring of, their managers.

Key resources

External manager engagement

After making a commitment, indirect investors should engage with their managers on how they monitor the governance, management and disclosure of physical and transition risks at the portfolio and portfolio company levels. They should also engage with any managers not fulfilling the climate change-related commitments agreed upon pre-investment.

Key resources

  • The PRI Reporting Framework requires all signatories to publicly report on their climate-related processes and activities annually in line with the TCFD recommendations. Indirect investors can use the public Transparency Report responses published in the Data Portal to engage with their managers.
  • The GRESB real estate assessment and infrastructure fund and asset assessments score investors and their holdings on their ESG performance, taking into consideration climate-related information based on the TCFD recommendations.
  • The ESG Data Convergence Project aims to improve the consistency and comparability of company ESG data reported by private equity managers to their clients. It includes four climate-related metrics: Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions and renewable energy use.
  • Sustainable real estate investment: Implementing the Paris Climate agreement - an action framework provides guidance for indirect real estate investors on monitoring, reporting and benchmarking external managers (pgs.28-30).
  • Indirect investors may also use the external manager engagement resources and tools cited in the Pre-commitment to fund section to monitor them during their fund ownership.

Investor disclosure

Throughout the ownership period, indirect investors should seek appropriate climate disclosures from their external managers and, in turn, disclose this information to their clients or beneficiaries as appropriate.

These should include disclosing their climate commitments, objectives and targets, the GHG emissions associated with their investments, and how they assess and manage their portfolios’ climate risks and opportunities. Much of this information will be obtained and assessed through due diligence, engagement and other aspects of the investment process described in this guide.

Key resources

III. Fund liquidation

GovernanceInvestmentExternal manager engagementInvestor disclosure
Fund liquidisation
NA NA NA
  • Carbon emissions
  • Assessment ofdisclosures

At the end of the fund’s life, indirect investors should focus on assessing and disclosing the climate performance of their allocation, by calculating a carbon emissions profile, for example, and evaluating their engagement outcomes and impacts. At the time of writing, there is no publicly available guidance focusing on climate change incorporation at the fund liquidation stage.

Section B: Direct investors

This section targets investors that are directly involved in the sourcing, selection, and operation of portfolio companies.

Figure 3: ICAPs expectations ladder mapped to the direct investment process

Governance Investment External_manager Investor_disclosure

Governance

Investment

Corporate engagement

Investor disclosure

Pre-acquisition
Asset ownership
Exit
N/A N/A

I. Pre-acquisition

GovernanceInvestmentCorporate engagementInvestor disclosure
Pre-acquisition
  • Policy
  • Accountability
  • Planning and evaluation
  • Skills assessment
  • Strategy
  • Risk management
  • Asset allocation
  • Additional target setting
  • Engagement
  • Commitments, objectives and targets
  • TCFD alignment

Governance

To effectively and systematically incorporate climate change into their investment process, direct investors must ensure they have robust internal governance structures in place. This includes:

  • ensuring that climate change is central to their organisation’s strategic plan;
  • defining roles and responsibilities for overseeing and implementing their commitments on climate change;
  • providing adequate resources to ensure they can effectively implement their climate change policies and plans;
  • developing a plan for delivering on their climate-related objectives and managing their portfolio risks and opportunities; and
  • providing training to staff on climate risks and opportunities and the implications for investment portfolios.

Direct investors should also seek to assess governance structures in their potential investments during due diligence to inform their investment decisions.

Key resources

Investment

As direct investors are positioned to incorporate climate change considerations in their deal origination, due diligence and execution, they should focus on the following before making an investment:

  • estimating portfolio emissions and setting their own reduction targets;
  • establishing a formal policy for integrating climate change into their investment analysis and decision making;
  • increasing investments in:
    • appropriate clean energy and low-carbon opportunities;
    • 1.5°-aligned companies; and
  • conducting scenario analysis and climate due diligence to inform investment decisions.

Key resources

Strategy:

Example: New Forests – integrating climate scenario analysis in strategic asset planning

Forestry investment manager New Forests integrates scenario analysis within its proprietary strategic asset planning framework. It takes users through a step-by-step process, beginning with establishing

a risk and impact appetite and then setting a risk tolerance and impact targets appropriate to the investment mandate. It then conducts manual scenario analysis on the inputs these steps generate. See TCFD for real assets investors (pgs.19-20).

Risk management:

  • The proposed NZIF private equity framework sets out what investors can do as part of pre-acquisition climate risk assessment and due diligence (pg.13).
  • The changing climate for private equity shares leading practices (pgs.31-35) and provides recommendations for direct investors (pg.46) related to climate risk assessment and investment management.
  • TCFD for private equity GPs (pgs.19-23) and TCFD for real assets investors (pgs.21-25) outline what investors can do to address the TCFD’s risk management-related recommendations.
  • The Investor Leadership Network’s (ILN) Climate Change Physical Risk Toolkit includes a step-by-step scoping methodology to identify physical climate risks and opportunities (pgs.14-33) applicable to private equity, real estate and infrastructure. The guidance can be used to evaluate potential investments during origination and initial due diligence.
  • UNEP FI’s Changing course TCFD pilot project provides a methodology for conducting scenario-based physical and transition risk assessments for real estate assets and portfolios (pgs.15-21) and includes case studies to demonstrate its implementation (pgs.35-56).
  • The ClimateWise Physical Risk Framework provides a methodology to help real estate investors understand and quantify physical risks as part of a pre-acquisition climate risk assessment (pgs.22-33).
  • The ClimateWise Transition Risk Framework provides an approach to assessing the potential financial impact from the low-carbon transition at the asset level (pgs.5-16). Although it is focused on infrastructure, it can be adapted to be applicable more broadly.
  • The Coalition for Climate Resilient Investment (CCRI)’s Risk and Resilience – Addressing physical climate risks in infrastructure investment paper presents a methodology to assess asset-level physical climate risks and guidance to integrate this into investment decision making for infrastructure assets (pgs.34-39). This can be applied when evaluating investment opportunities, and over an asset’s lifecycle when seeking refinancing or sale opportunities.
  • The ILN’s Climate change mitigation guide helps investors to assess companies’ scenario analyses, including questions to ask and criteria to distinguish between mature and partially developed scenarios (pgs.12-16). It also presents sector-specific emissions pathways referencing a 1.5ºC scenario (pgs.20).

Asset allocation and additional target setting:

  • TCFD for private equity GPs (pgs.27-30) and TCFD for real assets investors (pgs.28-31) provide guidance on how to identify and select relevant climate metrics, and how to set climate targets aligned with the TCFD recommendations.
  • The iCI and ERM’s Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Reporting guidance puts forward a methodology for accounting for scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions (pgs.29-56) that direct investors can apply to their own operations to support target setting and alignment with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Measuring financed emissions is also addressed (pgs.59-67).
  • Private equity sector-science based target guidance explains how to set operational and investment portfolio alignment targets required to reach well-below 2°C / 1.5°C climate scenarios, including:
    • setting science-based targets (SBTs) for Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions (pgs.33-40); 
    • specific guidance for real estate investors (pgs.40-41) and other direct investors (pgs.41-51);
    • how to treat acquisitions of companies with pre-existing SBTs; and
    • how to project SBT coverage for potential acquisitions with no prior targets (pgs.48-49).
  • The changing climate for private equity covers market practices around setting climate goals (pgs.36-39)
  • The NZIF recommends net-zero objectives for asset managers (pg.24). The real estate section (pgs.20-21) includes specific actions required to assess whether assets are aligned towards net zero, while the targets and objectives section (pgs.10-11) is also applicable to real estate investors.
  • The Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Financial Industry includes a detailed methodology and guidance to measure GHG emissions for commercial real estate assets (pgs.78-82).
  • Changing course: real estate - TCFD pilot project puts forward a methodology to assess how aligned potential assets are with global targets (pgs.17-18).
  • The World Green Building Councils’ Net Zero Carbon Buildings Commitment includes commitments for taking action towards decarbonising the built environment (pg.15).
  • Investors can use the Oxford Principles for Net-Zero Aligned Carbon Offsetting to assess the credibility and accountability of potential investees’ net-zero plans (pgs.5-12).
  • The Alignment Cookbook addresses how alignment assessments can be used for portfolio target-setting, which can guide additional investments in 1.5°C-aligned companies (pgs.25-29). It includes a high-level review of temperature alignment methods (pgs.32,33) and two methodologies that are suitable for infrastructure and private equity (pgs.147,148; 155,156).

Corporate engagement

Throughout due diligence, direct investors can identify opportunities to engage with potential companies/assets. They can also set expectations of their investments’ climate performance and monitoring in their deal documentation and business planning.

This engagement should seek to encourage better governance, management and disclosure of GHG emissions and physical climate risks, while it can ultimately also inform the investment decision.

Key resources

The corporate engagement resources applicable to Portfolio Company / Asset Ownership can also guide engagement with potential investments before acquisition.

Investor disclosure

Direct investors should disclose which climate-related policies and practices they implement pre-acquisition to clients. This includes publishing climate change portfolio targets, objectives and commitments, and reporting information in line with TCFD recommendations.

Signatories to the different climate initiatives (e.g., NZAOA, PAII) may have additional climate reporting and disclosure requirements as part of the commitments they have made. See the relevant initiative websites to learn more.

Key resources

Commitments, objectives and targets:

TCFD alignment:

II. Portfolio company / asset ownership

GovernanceInvestmentCorporate engagementInvestor disclosure
Asset ownership
  • Accountability
  • Board reporting
  • Skills assessment
  • Risk management
  • Engagement
  • Commitments, objectives and targets
  • Carbon emissions
  • Portfolio assessment
  • TCFD alignment

Governance

Throughout ownership, direct investors should maintain adequate oversight and accountability of climate-related risks and opportunities, and regularly report on those to the board and senior management.

Direct investors can provide training on climate risks and opportunities to their investees and should formally assess whether their portfolio company boards and senior management have sufficient knowledge and capabilities to oversee and manage climate change-related risks and opportunities.

 The resources shared in the Pre-acquisition section are also relevant here.

Investment

Once an asset is part of a portfolio, direct investors will need to monitor its climate performance – including its carbon emissions – and revise their scenario analyses to identify areas for improvement and ensure strategic objectives and climate targets are being met.

Key resources

Alignment target and additional target setting :

Examples:

KKR – Using ESG and climate management to monitor investments

US private equity manager KKR explains its ESG and climate management process, which includes steps to document and track, engage, monitor and manage its investments on relevant issues, in a case study highlighted by The changing climate for private equity (pg.35).

Investa – monitoring real estate portfolio alignment

Real estate investor Investa details how it has monitored the alignment of its real estate portfolio to its 2040 net-zero carbon emissions reduction target in Changing course: Real estate - TCFD pilot project (pgs.44–45), including mapping the (linear) reductions required to meet the target emissions level by 2033 under the 3°C, 2°C and 1.5°C scenarios for the whole portfolio.

Risk management :

Examples:

PAI Partners – using the SASB framework in due diligence

PAI Partners’ ESG team uses the SASB climate risk technical bulletin framework to conduct a preliminary risk analysis during its due diligence. This framework provides a birds-eye sector-based analysis of physical and transition risks that allows PAI Partners to delve into particular physical risks if needed. See TCFD for private equity GPs (pg.21).

Nuveen – developing a climate risk framework

US-based investment manager Nuveen, in collaboration with its farmland manager, Westchester, and timberland manager, GreenWood Resources, is developing a data-driven climate risk management framework. It will integrate climate science and transition scenarios into the firms’ investment processes and includes physical risk modelling, transition opportunity analysis and carbon portfolio optimisation. See TCFD for real assets investors (pg.31).

The climate risk assessment and scenario analysis guides highlighted in the Pre-acquisition stage can also be applied throughout ownership to monitor the climate risks and opportunities of assets.

Corporate engagement

During ownership, direct investors should seek to engage directly with their holdings to encourage better governance, management and disclosure of GHG emissions and physical climate risks. The climate risks and opportunities that they will identify through their risk assessment and scenario analysis, covered in the Investment section , should inform their engagement actions.

Key resources

Investor disclosure

Direct investors should disclose information related to their climate change practices and engagement to demonstrate transparency and accountability to investors and stakeholders. They should focus on reporting their:

  • progress against portfolio objectives and climate change targets;
  • carbon emissions figures, and the methodology and data used to produce these;
  • assessments of risks and opportunities resulting from considering climate change in analyses;
  • information in line with the TCFD recommendations; and
  • assessment of disclosures against guidance from other relevant reporting frameworks.

Key resources

Commitments objectives and targets:

Carbon emissions:

Portfolio assessment:

TCFD alignment:

III. Exit

GovernanceInvestmentCorporate engagementInvestor disclosure
Exit
NA
  • Strategy
NA
  • Carbon emissions
  • Assessment of disclosures

 

At the point of exit, direct investors should focus on assessing and disclosing the climate performance of an asset. There is currently limited guidance focusing on the incorporation of climate change specifically at the exit stage. Resources which touch on climate, and ESG incorporation more broadly, in private markets include: