Close menu
- Home
- About us
- Signatories
- News & events
- Investment tools
-
Sustainability issues
- Back to parent navigation item
- Sustainability issues
-
Environmental, social and governance issues
- Back to parent navigation item
- Environmental, social and governance issues
- Environmental issues
-
Social issues
- Back to parent navigation item
- Social issues
- Social issues - case studies
- Social issues - podcasts
- Social issues - webinars
- Social issues - blogs
- Cobalt and the extractives industry
- Clothing and Apparel Supply Chain
- Human rights
- Human rights - case studies
- Modern slavery and labour rights
- Covid-19
- Just transition
- Governance issues
- Climate change
- Sustainability outcomes
- Sustainable markets
- Research
- Policy
Active Ownership 2.0
Active Ownership 2.0 is a framework for the more ambitious stewardship needed to deliver against beneficiaries’ interests and improve the sustainability and resilience of the financial system.
Under this framework, investors use their influence to shape sustainability outcomes by engaging in more effective and assertive stewardship activities.
Introducing the framework
Discussion paper
Active Ownership 2.0: the evolution stewardship urgently needs
A framework for the future of stewardship where investors seek outcomes, prioritise systemic sustainability issues, and use collaboration as an integral tool to overcome the collective action problem.
Latest
Report: Putting resources where stewardship ambitions are
2024-05-14T09:52:00+01:00
This report by the Thinking Ahead Institute examines resourcing in stewardship.
Stewardship in private equity: A guide for general partners
2024-03-27T12:00:00+00:00
This guide aims to help private equity general partners execute stewardship of their portfolio companies, partly by highlighting best practices for both beginners and leaders in stewardship.
Evaluating managers’ stewardship for sustainability
2023-09-21T08:00:00+01:00
The PRI has created a tool to evaluate and compare managers’ stewardship practices for sustainability outcomes, and a due diligence questionnaire (DDQ) which they can use to discuss this topic with investment managers.
More resources
Board Accountability
Holding boards accountable for ESG: A business case
This article sets out the case for investors to ensure that investee company boards are held accountable when it comes to sustainability.
Are corporate boards responding to successful shareholder ESG proposals?
Why corporate board responsiveness to shareholder proposals that receive significant support matters.
Voting and divestment
Making voting count: principle-based voting on shareholder resolutions
How principle-based voting on shareholder resolutions can contribute to clear, effective and accountable stewardship
Discussing divestment: Developing an approach when pursuing sustainability outcomes in listed equities
For listed equity investors, the decision to engage with or divest from ESG laggards depends on the ESG issues concerned as well as the (sustainability) objectives of their clients and beneficiaries.
Featured content
- Previous
- Next
- The PRI is an investor initiative in partnership with UNEP Finance Initiative and UN Global Compact.
- PRI Association, 25 Camperdown Street, London, E1 8DZ, UK
- Company no: 7207947
- +44 (0)20 3714 3141
- [email protected]
-
PRI DISCLAIMER
The information contained on this website is meant for the purposes of information only and is not intended to be investment, legal, tax or other advice, nor is it intended to be relied upon in making an investment or other decision. All content is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not providing advice on legal, economic, investment or other professional issues and services. PRI Association is not responsible for the content of websites and information resources that may be referenced. The access provided to these sites or the provision of such information resources does not constitute an endorsement by PRI Association of the information contained therein. PRI Association is not responsible for any errors or omissions, for any decision made or action taken based on information on this website or for any loss or damage arising from or caused by such decision or action. All information is provided “as-is” with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy or timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, expressed or implied.
Content authored by PRI Association
For content authored by PRI Association, except where expressly stated otherwise, the opinions, recommendations, findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed are those of PRI Association alone, and do not necessarily represent the views of any contributors or any signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment (individually or as a whole). It should not be inferred that any other organisation referenced endorses or agrees with any conclusions set out. The inclusion of company examples does not in any way constitute an endorsement of these organisations by PRI Association or the signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment. While we have endeavoured to ensure that information has been obtained from reliable and up-to-date sources, the changing nature of statistics, laws, rules and regulations may result in delays, omissions or inaccuracies in information.
Content authored by third parties
The accuracy of any content provided by an external contributor remains the responsibility of such external contributor. The views expressed in any content provided by external contributors are those of the external contributor(s) alone, and are neither endorsed by, nor necessarily correspond with, the views of PRI Association or any signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment other than the external contributor(s) named as authors.
Site powered by Webvision Cloud